Chicago Democrat Sworn into Office from Jail

Typical Democrat! “A Felon that steals from Taxpayers” will soon become the actual Webster’s definition of “Democrat” if Democrats hold their present course!!! Exhibit A is found in this FrontPage Mag article by Daniel Greenfield

Wouldn’t it just be more convenient to move the city government into prison or to just treat government buildings as prisons? It would save commuting time and make trials much simpler.

Just ask Bob Battle.

Locks and bars didn’t stop East Chicago Councilman Robert Battle’s inauguration.

The newly sworn-in Battle can retain his public title and annual salary of $42,356 a year despite being held in Porter County Jail on federal drug and homicide charges.

He is pleading not guilty to a five-count indictment alleging he possessed cocaine and marijuana and killed a street gang member as part of a drug-dealing conspiracy.

Democrats are oddly unhappy, even though they seem to be big fans of Obama’s “free the drug dealers” plan. Not to mention restoring voting rights to felons.

“I can’t remember a situation like this,” Sheriff John Buncich, chair of the Lake County Democratic Central Committee, told the Tribune in November, when Battle was reelected just a few weeks after being charged with murder and drug dealing. “It’s wrong for the taxpayers, wrong for our party.”

How, exactly, a man charged with murder and drug dealing just days before an election could win reelection says a lot about life in this poor northwestern corner of Indiana.

The answer: he’s a Democrat.

Battle ran unopposed, winning with just 308 votes in a city of about 30,000 people.

Battle didn’t even vote for himself because he was in jail and didn’t request an absentee ballot, Buncich told NWI.com.

“I just think it’s just a matter of people not knowing [about the charges] and voting for the party they are familiar with,” Eisenstein told the Tribune.

That’s what happens when you have a one-party system.

As early as April, the agents with the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Lake County High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area task force were tapping his phone and investigating him for drug trafficking, according to an Oct. 14 indictment obtained by the Tribune.

On Sept. 23, officials caught Battle with 73 grams of marijuana and $100,700 in cash in his car, according to the indictment. Police also linked him to nine ounces of cocaine and three stolen guns found elsewhere, according to the documents.

Roughly three weeks later, Battle allegedly shot Camarillo in an alley behind Battle’s apartment. Battle said that he killed Camarillo in self-defense after Camarillo pulled a knife on him, according to court documents. But the Lake County Coroner’s Office ruled that Caramillo was shot once in the back, and police failed to find a knife at the scene, the Tribune reported.

Forget Trump, this is a guy who actually got reelected after shooting somebody in the back. Now those are real political skills. But the Democrats, despite their protests now, let it happen.

In 2014, reputed Imperial Gangster Eddie “Macho” Torres tesitified that East Chicago Councilman Robert “Coop” Battle had been involved in the drug trade in the past. Add that to the multiple arrests for possession of marijuana and you get a picture of a candidate most political parties would want to dump. Not so with the Lake County Democratic Party. Battle could have been easily removed from the ballot in several ways, but no one ever challenged him.

Election Board records show that Robert Battle filed a pre-primary report in 2011 showing that Battle neither received nor spent money in the campaign. While that alone should be enough for a challenge, he never filed a single report after that. Candidates are required to file 3 reports in an election year and an annual report in non-election years. Despite that, Battle appeared on the 2015 ballot unchallenged.

What’s the difference between a criminal and a Democrat? No, seriously. What’s the difference?

Source : FRONTPAGE MAG

Did Trump Vote for Obama??? | Glenn Beck

Let’s hypothesize for a moment that Donald Trump did actually vote for Obama in the 2008 election. If so, should it matter? If a presidential candidate’s long-standing track record, opinions and stated beliefs hold any value, it should. Glenn has emphatically stated his belief that Trump voted for Obama in the 2008 election, laying out a series of facts that would make it hard to believe otherwise. Take a look at some of those facts below. Does it matter? Should you care? If you’re unsure, ask yourself this question: Would you have ever voted for Obama under any circumstances? Take the poll below.
trump_infog_v2_3

It’s Time for Candidates to Discuss the Enemy Within | The Counter Jihad Report

Note: I agree with the writer, Ted Cruz has introduced legislation that would designate the Muslim Brotherhood and it’s affiliate groups (ISNA, CAIR, etc….) as  terrorist organizations. I support #TedCruz, but he needs to put this legislation OUT FRONT AND CENTER in his campaign!!! This is the most important issue facing America today and Ted knows it, but he has to VOICE IT LOUDLY and just take whatever heat he gets over it, because that is what Americans want and need to hear!!!

 

It’s Time for Candidates to Discuss the Enemy Within

EgyptElectionsConservative Review, by Daniel Horowitz, December 28th, 2015: (h/t @PoliticalShort)

When Congress returns in January, there will be a robust debate over the authorization of use of military force (AUMF) in Syria and Iraq to fight ISIS.  But while we debate a bunch of lousy options and the potential cost of lives and billions of dollars arming our enemies in endless Islamic civil wars, the politicians in both parties will never discuss the enemy within the United States.  This is where the presidential candidates must lead by example.

Donald Trump and Ted Cruz have already drawn attention to the first half of the homeland security threat – the endless migration from the Middle East as manifest through our suicidal immigration policies.  Unfortunately, Republicans didn’t listen, and despite the universally-accepted threat of the Syrian and Somali refugees, they gave Obama the full $1.67 billion for refugee resettlement in the Omnibus bill.

However, it is the second half of the equation – the most foundational threat to our homeland and society – that has garnered almost no attention from anyone in politics.  That is the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood organizations in America that have so much influence both on the Obama administration and the Muslim communities in our country.

Three questions should automatically come to mind in light of the San Bernardino attack and the nearly daily incidents of Muslims being arrested for plotting terror attacks or attempting to join ISIS.

  1. Why is our government expunging any mention of Islamic terror from their official documents and hampering investigations into connections to local radical Muslim Brotherhood groups?
  2. Why are so few moderate Muslims speaking out against the growing trend of radicalization?
  3. Why are so many Muslims in America, even those who were born here, being drawn into groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda?

The answer to all these questions, point to the Muslim Brotherhood and the influence of their three North American affiliates that were implicated in the Holy Land Foundation terror trial: the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), and the North American Islamic Trust.

Last Wednesday, I had the privilege of guest hosting the Sean Hannity show along with my colleague, Deneen Borelli, and we discussed why the Muslim Brotherhood represents a more foundational threat to our homeland than ISIS or Al Qaeda.  They are the enemy within that radicalizes American Muslims (the ones that weren’t already radicalized), marginalizes and intimidates moderates, and influences the government to eschew any policy that even mentions Islamic terror much less policies that actually combat Islamic terror.

[My segment on the Muslim Brotherhood can be found here.  You will hear national security expert, Patrick Poole, discuss how this problem started long before the Obama administration.]

This is why we need the GOP candidates to step up to the plate.  But until now they have largely been silent.  Ted Cruz has introduced an important piece of legislation, which would designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group, but he needs to make this issue more front and center in his campaign.

Just last week, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron took the unprecedented step to designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terror group after his government launched an exhaustive study into their activities.  They will now ban visas to Muslim Brotherhood officials and increase surveillance of their offices.   If the liberal Europeans are willing to protect themselves and root out their enemy within, cannot our “conservative” leaders muster the same courage?

Not surprisingly, Obama condemned Cameron’s move as a needless de-legitimizing of a non-violent group.  But their use of “non-violent” means of subversion in western countries to marginalize moderates and quietly radicalize the Muslim communities and mosques is exactly what will destroy both America and Europe from the inside.

It was recently reported that the U.K. is experiencing a sharp drop off in cooperation from local Muslims in rooting out terrorists from their communities.  Undoubtedly, the Muslim Brotherhood intimidation is a big part of this deterrent against cooperating with the authorities.

Earlier this month, Phil Haney, a former DHS counterterrorism official, wrote an expose on how he was stifled from connecting the dots between some of the very same foreign terror groups Tafsheen Malik was affiliated with and local Muslim groups in America:

“But after more than six months of research and tracking; over 1,200 law enforcement actions and more than 300 terrorists identified; and a commendation for our efforts; DHS shut down the investigation at the request of the Department of State and DHS’ own Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Division. They claimed that since the Islamist groups in question were not Specially Designated Terrorist Organizations (SDTOs) tracking individuals related to these groups was a violation of the travelers’ civil liberties. These were almost exclusively foreign nationals: When were they granted the civil rights and liberties of American citizens?Worse still, the administration then went back and erased the dots we were diligently connecting. Even as DHS closed my investigation, I knew that data I was looking at could prove significant to future counterterror efforts and tried to prevent the information from being lost to law enforcement.”

It’s not surprising that DHS’s Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Division (CRCL) was responsible for shutting down the investigation.  CRCL is the nexus for the Muslim Brotherhood influence in our government.  In 2008, under the Bush administration, then-DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff drafted a memo for CRCL that called on government officials to strip all references of Islamic supremacism from their training.  This memo was drafted, in the words of Chertoff, based on “its discussions with a broad range of Muslim American community leaders and scholars.”  In 2011, based on the same recommendations of these Muslim Brotherhood “scholars,” DHS published its training and guidance manual on the Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) agenda.  The manual instructs the bureaucrats to use examples to “demonstrate that terrorists and violent extremists vary in ethnicity, race, gender, and religion.”

If ISIS is the new quarterback for Islamic terror, the Muslim Brotherhood is their all-star offensive linemen. In theory the United States should have a great defensive line capable of overwhelming ISIS’ strategy. But with our very own Department of Homeland Security playing ball for the Muslim Brotherhood, the fox appears to be guarding the henhouse.

 

Source :

The Counter Jihad Report

Surviving an Active Shooter Event

thI was doing a little research earlier and found a video called “Run, Hide, Fight”. It was posted by the Houston, Texas Mayors Office, and links to the FBI website. I thought it somewhat peculiar, but wanted to pass it along and offer criticism.


 

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cirg/active-shooter-and-mass-casualty-incidents/run-hide-fight-video

From that page :

This video, recently produced by the Houston Mayor’s Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security, dramatizes an active shooter incident in the workplace. Its purpose is to educate the public on how to respond during such an incident. Warning: The initial sequence in this video may be disturbing.

 

Transcript:

Narrator: It may feel like just another day at the office.

A series of shots shows a standard office. People work at cubicles. One desk has an American flag.

But occasionally, life feels more like an action movie than reality.

A muscular man dressed in all black, wearing sunglasses and carrying a backpack, walks towards the office building. Inside the building, the employees are still going about their daily tasks. A security guard talks with a woman. A visitor greets a staff member.

Narrator: The authorities are working hard to protect you and to protect our public spaces.

Two employees say hello to each other and get into the elevator.

Narrator: But sometimes, bad people do bad things.

We cut back to the sidewalk outside, as we continue to see the man in black approaching the building. As he walks, a series of facts are displayed on the screen.

Caption: 21 killed, 19 wounded at a fast food restaurant. 32 killed, 25 wounded while attending class.

Narrator: Their motivations are different.

Caption: 6 killed, 13 wounded at a shopping center.

The man in black starts up the steps to the glass front doors of the building.

Caption: 13 killed, 29 wounded while at work.

Narrator: The warning signs may vary, but the devastating effects are the same.

The man in black opens the front door of the building. As he enters, we see a notice on the glass prohibiting the carrying of concealed handguns in the building under penalty of trespass.

Narrator: … and unfortunately, you need to be prepared for the worst.

The camera pans past a series of people at their desks and stops in front of the elevator, where the security guard is talking with an employee. The man in black walks past the guard, removes a shotgun from his backpack, turns around, and shoots the security guard and two employees. More shots are fired. A woman at a photocopier hears the noise and looks around.

Narrator: If you are to ever find yourself in the middle of an active shooter event, your survival may depend on whether or not you have a plan.

The man in black stops shooting in the lobby and starts walking off.

Narrator: The plan doesn’t have to be complicated.

A man in a purple shirt looks up, startled. A woman hangs up a phone and looks down the hallway at the commotion.

Narrator: The plan doesn’t have to be complicated. There are three things you could do that make a difference: Run. Hide. Fight.

The woman who was on the phone stands up, moves into the hallway, and looks scared. Another woman, wearing pink, sits at her desk with an alarmed look on her face. She then gets out of her chair and moves under her desk.

Narrator: First and foremost, if you can get out, do.

The man in purple starts running down the hallway. He grabs the woman who was on the phone and continues moving towards the exit.

Narrator: Always try and escape or evacuate, even when others insist on staying.

The man in purple and the woman who was on the phone pass the cubicle of the woman in pink. They help her up and the three continue moving towards the exit.

Narrator: Encourage others to leave with you, but don’t let them slow you down with indecision.

The man in purple stops, looks around a corner, then continues to lead the two women out. The woman in pink looks very afraid, but the other woman encourages her to keep going. The three employees enter the stairwell and start moving up the stairs.

Narrator: Remember what’s important: you, not your stuff. Leave your belongings behind, and try to find a way to get out safely.

The three employees leave the building through an emergency exit. The camera turns to a mechanical area behind the building, where another man is locking a bicycle to a bike rack.

Narrator: Trying to get yourself out of harm’s way needs to be your number one priority.

The three employees come around a bend and take shelter behind a cinderblock wall protecting mechanical equipment. They are now out of sight of the front of the building and the emergency exit.

The man with the bicycle has headphones off, and walks off, looking at his phone. The man in purple runs out and gets the bicyclist’s attention. One of the women screams “hey” at the cyclist.

Narrator: Once you are out of the line of fire, try to prevent others from walking into the danger zone and call 911.

The man in purple leads the cyclist back to the area where the employees are sheltering. The woman who had been on the telephone calls the police from her cell phone. The woman in pink is still panicking, but remains with the group.

Caption: RUN. When an active shooter is in your vicinity:

· If there is an escape path, attempt to evacuate.

· Evacuate whether others agree to or not.

· Leave your belongings behind.

· Help others escape if possible.

· Prevent others from entering the area.

· Call 9-1-1 when you are safe.

The camera cuts back to the office, where we see the woman who was at the photocopier. She looks out the door, but quickly ducks back into the room.

Narrator: If you can’t get out safely, you need to find a place to hide.

The woman from the copier closes the copy room door and looks around the room. The camera cuts to a group sitting in the break room. More shots ring out. The employees in the break room stop talking and begin to look around. They all rise from the table at the same time. A man in a brown suit motions for the group to stay still for a minute, and a woman in red says “oh my gosh.” The man in the suit looks out into the hallway and sees other people running at the far end of the hallway. He moves back into the break room and closes the door. Another man, in a blue shirt, signals the others to stay quiet as he and a man in yellow move the table to barricade the door.

Narrator: Act quickly and quietly. Try to secure your hiding place the best you can.

The camera cuts back to the copy room, where the woman at the photocopier moves the machine in front of the door. She then shuts off the lights and pulls out a cell phone.

Narrator: Turn out lights, and if possible, remember to lock doors. Silence your ringer and vibration mode on your cell phone.

The woman in the copy room slides the ringer volume control on her phone to silent, then turns the vibrate mode off. The camera cuts to the shooter, who is walking through a set of cubicles. The employees are all in hiding or have left the building. He reaches for a doorknob, but finds it

locked and moves on.

Narrator: And if you can’t find a safe room or closet, try to conceal yourself behind large objects that may protect you.

The camera shows the woman in the copy room crouched in the corner between the wall and the copier, her eyes closed, silent.

Narrator: Do your best to remain quiet and calm.

Caption: HIDE. If an evacuation is not possible, find a place to hide.

· Lock and/or blockade the door.

· Silence your cell phone.

· Hide behind large objects.

· Remain very quiet.

Caption: Your hiding place should:

· Be out of the shooter’s view.

· Provide protection of shots are fired in your direction.

· Not trap or restrict your options for movement.

The music switches from suspenseful to a faster tempo. The camera switches to the break room, where the group of employees realize that they are in trouble.

Narrator: As a last resort, if your life is at risk, whether you’re alone or working together as a group, fight! Act with aggression. Improvise weapons. Disarm him.

The employees in the break room try to calm the woman who is panicking, and begin organizing themselves. The man in yellow picks up a chair. He looks apprehensive, but moves towards the door. The panicking woman moves into a corner. The man in brown stands to the side of the door, holding a fire extinguisher above his head, ready to swing. He silently mouths to the others, asking if they’re ready.

Narrator: … and commit to taking the shooter down, no matter what.

The shooter enters the break room holding an assault rifle, and the employees attack. Two employees are holding coffee mugs, while the other two start to swing with the fire extinguisher and chair.

Caption: FIGHT. As a last resort, and only if your life is in danger:

· Attempt to incapacitate the shooter.

· Act with physical aggression.

· Improvise weapons.

· Commit to your actions.

The tempo of the background music slows, as the camera cuts back to the exterior of a building. Three more employees exit, and the group in the mechanical area gets their attention, directing them to the hiding place.

Narrator: Try to be aware of your environment. Always have an exit plan.

The camera cuts back to the interior of the building. The police have arrived. Some are patrol officers, wearing blue uniforms. Others are part of the SWAT team, wearing camouflage fatigues and helmets. All the officers are holding assault rifles. They are entering in a tactical formation, with some officers looking forward while others check to the sides and behind them. They stay as a tight group.

Narrator: Know that in an incident like this, victims are generally chosen randomly. The event is unpredictable and may evolve quickly.

The officers begin entering offices one by one, searching for the shooter. They pass a man lying on the ground, continuing to search for the man in black.

Narrator: The first responders on the scene are not there to evacuate or tend to the injured. They are well-trained, and are there to stop the shooter.

The music changes to a more upbeat, militaristic march. The police continue to do a room-by-room search as they pass by more casualties. Officers check each stall in a bathroom before moving down another hallway.

Caption: 9-1-1. When law enforcement arrives:

· Remain calm and follow instructions.

· Keep your hands visible at all times.

· Avoid pointing or yelling.

· Know that help for the injured is on its way.

The front door of the building slams open and more employees pour out. They are running with their hands in the air, palms facing forward to demonstrate that they are not holding any weapons. A man assists others as they round a bend on an exterior stairwell. We then see a shot of a fire engine parked in front of the building.

Narrator: Your actions can make a difference for your safety and survival. Be aware and be prepared.

More people leave the front door as a firefighter directs them towards a rallying point. More people are running down the exterior stairwell. As he rounds a landing, a man removes his suit jacket, but does not slow down. Other employees, including the group from the break room, are crouched on the ground by the fire engine, out of breath, but uninjured.

Narrator: And if you find yourself faced with an active shooter, there are three key things you need to remember to survive: Run. Hide. Fight.

The camera pans across the employees congregated by the fire engine. Many are talking with one another. Others are on cell phones. A firefighter moves past, giving directions as the screen fades to black.

Caption: “Run. Hide. Fight.: Surviving an Active Shooter Event” is a Department of Homeland Security Grant Funded Project of the Regional Catastrophic Planning Initiative. Produced by the City of Houston Mayor’s Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security. Ready Houston, www.readyhoustontx.gov.

Caption: For more information: www.readyhoustontx.gov.

Screen fades to black.


 

Hold on…………..Let me silence my cell phone ringer

I’m glad to see the government is trying, but I have to be honest with you, I may not follow all of their advice!!!

Every situation is unique. In the FBI video they say to only “FIGHT. As a last resort, and only if your life is in danger“.    Well I think we crossed into the “My life is in DANGER!” zone the minute someone started popping off caps in the building I’m occupying! Don’t you agree?

If there is any way possible I’m capping the gunman off even if I’m not armed, and I’d hope to be armed. But even if you are not armed there is no reason for 5 or 10 or even 15 people to sit back and wait to get shot!!!

I agree with taking cover if possible but all the “barricade yourself in a room and silence your cell phone ringer” stuff is a little far-fetched in most mass shooting scenarios. Should we order a pizza maybe???

If someone is shooting everyone they see, they are going to empty a magazine fairly quickly. And that is when he’s mine. And if you are all close enough to the shooter to jump on him, you have to stay clear of the muzzle but 2 or 3 people could easily disarm a gunman if they are close, especially if he has a rifle.

This video reminds me of the famous advice for rape victims “urinate on yourself“. I think AWARENESS of what to do in a scenario like this is important. If there are 10 people close to the gunman and he is shooting everyone you may as well all jump on him!

If you are lucky you’ll be in Texas or another gun-friendly state and lots of good guys will have guns, bringing your gunman’s killing career to an abrupt end with some hot lead. The way to stop bad guys with guns is with GOOD GUYS WITH GUNS! Arm yourselves and be prepared. Discuss the scenario and how you will react with family and friends.

 

If you are serious about staying alive during an “active shooter” crisis I would recommend arming yourself and maybe checking out something a little more realistic. I found this video earlier, and I like how it demonstrates that a woman can disarm an active shooter by using any opportunity. Something like this would be far more helpful than the FBI video in my opinion. I found these on Youtube, which stress some important factors.

Unarmed Defense Against an Active Shooter

Dealing with an Active Shooter in the Workplace

Hopefully it will be something you never need. Once you create your “plan of action” be sure to share it with friends and family members, those who you’ll likely be with when something like this kicks off. It’s important everyone is on the same page.

And I personally think that we as Americans all need to take the Flight 93 pledge, and if something like this does happen then “Let’s Roll!!!” Because quite honestly, peeing on yourself won’t save anyone.

“Why are we letting them in?” New video ad dismantles case for refugee influx

Are we as American going to allow Obama brow beat us into letting thousands of possible terrorists into our country? Everyone who is honest with themselves KNOWS the man is anti-American, and his “fundamental transformation” of America means to destroy the country. Obama is allied with terrorists in one common goal, America’s demise.


 

 

Source The Counter Jihad Report

Center for Security Policy, Dec. 6, 2015:

President Obama has ordered his administration to bring in ten thousand more refugees from the Syrian civil war over the next year alone. This represents nearly a tenfold increase in the number of refugees resettled in the United States since the beginning of that war, yet all in a single year. And that’s not all. Secretary of State Kerry says that, under this administration, the United States is “committed” to increasing the number of refugees it will accept. After a closed-door meeting with the President, Kerry made clear that Obama is personally invested in the United States taking “a leadership role” in the refugee issue. The Associated Press reminds us in its report on Kerry’s remarks that the United States took more than a million refugees after the fall of Vietnam, and speculates that the Obama administration may raise the annual limit above 70,000 refugees a year. Democratic leaders are already asking the President to consider a figure of 65,000.

Read the Full Story at :

Source: “Why are we letting them in?” New video ad dismantles case for refugee influx

Colorado Shooting seems tailor made for Left’s Agenda

I want to share with you an article from the Media Research Center showing the Sunday talk shows on the Colorado shootings. It shows how they asked the GOP candidates about the shooting, how it relates to abortion clinics, and how “rhetoric, blogs, anti PP tapes” etc…. etc…. are all to blame for this attack. Basically EVERYONE is responsible except the guy who done the shooting!!! Loretta Lynch coined the term “crime against women” for the Administration, and even got the Colorado Governor to parrot her remarks. The left is using this issue to attack freedom of speech, by way of blaming bloggers and news for the attacks. And they are even getting to take pot shots at the people who produced the undercover Planned Parenthood videos! All we know about the shooter is he was mumbling about “baby parts”, and it’s everyone’s fault but his!!! It’s almost like the left “created” this shooting is it not??? This one event let’s them progress so many of their agendas!!! It’s all a little too convenient for me….and “Project MK-Ultra” has been in my thoughts for days now!!!

http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/brad-wilmouth/2015/11/29/nets-hit-gop-guests-after-shootings-pp-charges-hateful-rhetoric

Loretta Lynch coins the term “crime against women” for the administration, even though two of the three victims were MEN!!!

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting/index.html

Gov. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, parrots Loretta Lynch’s talking point about this “Crime Against Women” (Even though two of the three victims were men) and goes on to blame talk shows and bloggers

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2015/11/30/in-wake-of-shooting-co-governor-focuses-on-bloggers-talk-shows-and-guns/

According to this report on PBS Newshour, a witness said the man was “mumbling and ranting while he was shooting.” And one of his neighbors said “If you talked to him, nothing with him was very cognitive — topics all over place,”

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/police-search-for-motives-in-colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting/

And according to the author of this story, who classifies shooter  as white, conservative, and pro-life right in the tag line…….wonder where he stands politically??? Has anyone proved he is either pro-life OR conservative??? Anyway, here’s an excerpt with the names.

Excerpt: The victims have been identified as University of Colorado-Colorado Springs Police Officer, father, husband and pastor Garrett Swasey, 44,; Jennifer Markovsky, a 36-year-old married mother of two originally from Hawaii; and Ke’Arre Stewart, a 29-year-old married father and Iraq War veteran.

http://heavy.com/news/2015/11/robert-lewis-dear-colorado-springs-planned-parenthood-shooting-gunman-shooter-suspect-name-photos-identity-identified-charges-family-motive-pro-life-conservative-age-white/

We all know this shooting will be used over and over and over again by those in the left in attacking Conservatives and especially GOP Presidential candidates. And I’ll bet you, at the end of the day we find this guy is neither a Conservative, or pro-lifer…………..but he IS WHITE so they’ll hammer us to death on that point, but I’d  wager when all is told, the guy will turn out to be a liberal! And I still think that the “Project MK-Ultra” possibility will be haunting my thoughts!!! The fact that mass shootings happen 3 times as often since Obama has taken office than it did from 2000 to 2007 just seems too obvious to dismiss. Then Obama is on the stage talking gun-control within literally hours………….it’s all a little much for me. Do the research on mass shootings like I have, using Obama’s term as your guide………….and you too will find it fishy…………and scary!

Don’t know about the MK Ultra program??? Wish I didn’t!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

 

Syrians crossing into Texas from Mexico

We now not only have Obama using our tax dollars to import terrorist laden immigrants from Syria, but they are streaming in side by side with Illegals from South America from Mexico

 

From Creeping Sharia at WordPress.com