The LEFT’s beef with white people EXPLAINED

The Left is at WAR with White people!!! In 2012 the left decided that the white vote was no longer needed and they began to focus their energy on turning EVERY OTHER GROUP in America against Whites, a full on assault……….Which they call “Social Justice”

The cultural Marxists who want nothing more than to destroy this country and turn it into another failed Socialist mess. So they teach revisionist history and repeat their lies all day every day in the hopes of convincing you they are right.

Comments Off on The LEFT’s beef with white people EXPLAINED Posted in Political

Thank GOD for the “Alternative” Media!!!

The corrupt Liberal Media is OWNED by Democrats and the “Ruling Class”. In case you are behind the curve let me tell you something……. ALL politicians are a part of the “Ruling Class”. They are the people who are “above the law”. 

They don’t have to follow the same rules as the rest of us are expected to follow!!!

And they get away with a LOT!!! Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and James Comey ALL belong in PRISON!!!

But they have not even had charges leveled against them!!!

They take care of their own and throw YOU uner the bus!!!

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Comments Off on Thank GOD for the “Alternative” Media!!! Posted in Political

Border Crisis turned Invasion

The Border Crisis is all in our heads according to Democrats. But according to this man from the Border Patrol it’s getting VERY REAL VERY FAST!!!

Border Patrol Update

The Border Invasion is getting out of hand!

Not only is George Soros funding these “Caravans” of illegals heading into the United States, he is also getting US taxpayer money to help fund it!!!

So Americans are footing the bill to bring these Illegal #Immigrants to the United States, then we get to fund trying to deport them all!!!

Don’t you just love how Democrats and Congress spend our tax dollars???

Soros and Taxpayers funding Caravans of illegal immigrants crossing into the United States!

George Soros and United States taxpayers are actually funding the endless caravans heading to the US border!

It’s amazing to me that the people in Congress are so corrupt, so evil, and just so dishonest that they’d actually use taxpayer money to finance these caravans bringing illegal immigrants to the United States. The United States gives funds to the UN which in turn gives the money to George Soros who uses it to fund these caravans!

Then use the same taxpayers money to try to control the invasion!!! This is CRIMINAL and it’s time that Americans wake up to what’s really going on!!!

Censored Lou Dobbs footage

Censored Lou Dobbs footage of guest talking about taxpayers funding these caravans from InfoWars

It’s just amazing to me the criminality that we have in Congress and top to bottom in the Democratic Party! They are looking to collapse the American economy at all cost. Democrats have went over the edge completely. They are now openly calling for Socialism and every Democrat running for President supports the Green New Deal which would certainly be the death of America!

There is only 1 way for Americans to save this country at this point. We must send HAND WRITTEN letters to our State Representatives calling for them to support the Article 5 Convention of States.

Congress will NEVER reel themselves in!!! Only we can make this happen. The Founders KNEW the strong possibility that Congress could go out of control. That is why they put in the Constitution! The first part of Article 5 allows Congress to amend the Constitution, the second part of Article 5 is for the STATES to take control of an out of control Congress!!!

And that is what we have in America today! Please look into “Article 5 Convention of States” and don’t listen to those who talk about “how dangerous it is” because those are lies told by the people in Congress now!!!

It requires 34 states to amend the Constitution, so their claims of all the insanity which could come out of it is baseless. PLEASE listen to Mark Levin speak about it here:

Mark Levin Article 5 Convention of States

Mark Levin Article 5 Convention of States

Now PLEASE go and sign the petition calling for a Convention of States!!! The link is below. America needs YOU!!! Sign the petition and PLEASE SHARE!!!

Official Convention of States website petition

Official Convention of States website petition

The founders put section 2 of Article 5 into the Constitution for a reason! The reason has become very clear as we watch Congress, the Media, and Democrats spiral out of control If we don’t act now the criminals in Congress may amend the Constitution removing the States’ ability to amend it!!! It’s TIME to TAKE AMERICA BACK!!!

 

Comments Off on Border Crisis turned Invasion Posted in Political

Democrats ARE the “Existential Threat” they keep talking about!!!

The #Socialist #Democrats‘ new favorite term is “Existential Threat”. They toss it around like a little kid with a brand new toy in reference to “Climate Change”.

CO2 is actually GOOD for the planet, it is a by-product produced by human beings themselves!!! All of the trees and the plants on this planet “breathe” CO2 and “exhale” Oxygen, which human beings NEED to survive.

Screenshot_43

NRATV Video

Screenshot_44

NRATV Video:

So their argument is flawed to say the least!!! Their BS “science” is designed for one purpose. CONTROL. They want to control EVERYTHING through government.

I am really sick of hearing how “Climate Change” is an Existential Threat!!! Big words and small minds don’t mix well!!

Let’s talk about the REAL Existential Threat. DEMOCRATS and the New World Order. They want to control EVERYONE on this planet!!! They want to micromanage your everyday life.

They want to control your diet, the information you are “allowed” to have, and even what information shows up when you do a search on Google.

The REAL Existential Threat we face as humans is these people who want to control us all!!!

That’s why they want to take your #Guns!!! You cannot exercise total control over people until you disarm them!!!

Friend………. They are looking to have TOTAL CONTROL over this planet and EVERYONE on it!!!

I personally believe they are such a threat to ALL of us that they need to be ejected from government altogether. Many of them BELONG in #Prison!!!

You better take notice NOW!!! Because they are fighting EVERY DAY to realize their dream of TOTAL CONTROL.

There have been more mass shootings in America since #Obama took office than there was in ALL OF HISTORY!!!

And the FIRST thing you’ll hear after each of these shootings is “Gun Control”!!! And “We must ban these guns and those guns and the other guns to guarantee our safety.

It has become such a regular occurrence that I have come to believe the Democrats themselves are involved in these mass shootings for the sole purpose of disarming YOU!!!

Nevermind the FACT that gun control would NOT have stopped a single one of these shootings.

Nevermind the FACT that disarming EVERY LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN in America WOULD NOT STOP THESE SHOOTINGS!!!

#Criminals do NOT obey the #Laws. So no matter what kind of law you create a CRIMINAL will ignore it!!! #Murder is already illegal!!! Most of these mass shootings occur in parts of the country that have the STRICTEST GUN CONTROL LAWS!!!

So it’s easy to see that it does NOT work. They don’t care!!!

What they want is TOTAL POWER over EVERYONE on the planet!!! In order to achieve that they MUST disarm EVERY LAW ABIDING CITIZEN IN THE COUNTRY!!!

Look at New Zealand!!! Islamic Terrorists have carried out 34,772 DEADLY ATTACKS since 9/11.

And 1 Mosque gets attacked killing 50 people or so and New Zealand instantly wants to ban just about all weapons!!!

These people will do ANYTHING to get TOTAL CONTROL over YOU and your family, including stage mass shootings in my opinion!!! It’s up to YOU to stop them!!!

Join the NRA!!! Write every Congressman in #Congress!!! DEFEND THE SECOND AMENDMENT until your last breath

with EVERYTHING you have!!!

It’s the ONLY thing that protects humanity from these people gaining TOTAL CONTROL over them!!!

You want to talk Existential Threats Democrats? IT’S YOU!!!

#Vote #Republican and defend the 2nd amendment with your LIFE!!!

 

SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2TWdfqq

SOURCE: NRATV http://bit.ly/2TUj3Ra

SOURCE: (PHOTO) http://creepingsharia.com/

American Thinker|For the Record, Obama Made Mincemeat of the Constitution

For the Record, Obama Made Mincemeat of the Constitution

Good constitutional arguments can be made for and against President Trump’s evocation of emergency powers to address the crisis at our southern border.  But the notion that such a declaration would encourage a future Democratic president to do something similar borders on the comic.  Democrats don’t need encouragement.

Under President Barack Obama, the Constitution was violated more wantonly than a goat at a Taliban bachelor party, and the faithful cheered every violation.  In early 2014, New Yorker editor and Obama groupie David Remnick wrote about his experience accompanying Obama on a west-coast fundraising tour.

Obama confirmed to the audience that, yes, people did want him to sign more executive orders and “basically nullify Congress.”  At that point, wrote Remnick, “Many in the crowd applauded their approval.  Yes!  Nullify it!”  These were not wild-eyed tent-dwellers on Wall or some lesser street.  These were potential donors.

By 2014, Obama had successfully nullified any number of laws with negligible media objection.  In February 2011, for instance, Obama and “wing man” Attorney General Eric Holder came willy-nilly to the conclusion that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was not “constitutional.”  President Bill Clinton signed DOMA into law in 1996 with overwhelming support from Democrats in Congress and nearly unanimous support from Republicans.

No matter.  Going forward, Obama decided that the Justice Department would no longer enforce DOMA.  That simple.  Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley had a hard time making legal sense out of Obama’s left-field decision to ignore DOMA.  For one, Turley found the timing curious.  The Obama administration had been defending the law for the previous two years, and the president, publicly, at least, had not changed his personal stance on redefining marriage.

For another, Obama was basing this policy change on an interpretation “that had thus far remained unsupported by direct precedent.”  By refusing to enforce DOMA, Obama was setting a precedent and not a good one — namely, that a president could refuse to defend a law based on a legal interpretation that no court had ever accepted.

On the subject of illegal immigration, Obama did not bother deeming existing laws unconstitutional.  He chose not to enforce them because they did not poll well among Hispanic voters. It would get no deeper than that.

Since year one of the Bush administration, Congress had been trying to pass the awkwardly titled Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, better known as the DREAM Act.  In a nutshell, this bill would have provided permanent residency to those illegal aliens who had arrived in the United States as minors and behaved themselves well enough not to get their mug shots plastered on the Post Office wall.

Although President Bush supported immigration reform, as did President Obama, neither the DREAM Act nor any major immigration bill made it to their desks. The reason was simple enough: no variation of such a bill could muster adequate congressional support.

In his 2006 book, Audacity of Hope, Obama praised the system of checks and balances in that it “encouraged the very process of information gathering, analysis, and argument.”  Once Obama ascended to the presidency, all those checks and balances just made it harder for him to transform America.

Obama’s constituencies, especially labor and the Hispanic lobby, wanted action, not gathering and arguing.  They started leaning on him to ignore Congress and act unilaterally.  One minor obstacle stood in the way, and that was Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution.  For the previous 220 years, that article had informed Congress in some detail on how to turn an idea into a law.

Obama could not enforce the DREAM Act, said constitutional scholar Nicholas Rosenkrantz, “by pretending that it passed when it did not.”  As late as March 2011, legal scholar Obama seemed to agree.  “America is a nation of laws, which means I, as the president, am obligated to enforce the law,” he told a Univision audience.  “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed.”

By June 2012, what Obama said in March 2011 seemed as stale as a morning-after bowl of tortilla chips.  The president had lost his taste for all that legislative analysis and argument, given that the result was “an absence of any immigration action from Congress.”

Five months before the presidential election, he knew that the media would give him a pass, and he hoped Latinos would give him their vote.  So he decided to dispense with debate and fix immigration policy by his own lights, confident he could make that policy “more fair, more efficient, and more just.”

This fix started with presidentially guaranteed relief from deportation for the so-called “Dreamers.”  On top of that came the right to apply for work authorization, both guarantees in full defiance of existing federal law.  “There has long been a general consensus that a president cannot refuse to enforce a law that is considered constitutionally sound,” said Jonathan Turley.  That chapter was apparently missing from Obama’s law books.

On August 23, 2013, in a move that the major media barely noticed, the Obama administration subtly expanded the list of those who would be excluded from deportation.  Deep in a nine-page memo from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters to its field offices was an order that “prosecutorial discretion” be shown to parents or guardians of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents, AKA “Dreamers.”

The news scarcely troubled the media, let alone the citizenry, but at least a few Republicans noticed.  “President Obama has once again abused his authority and unilaterally refused to enforce our current immigration laws,” said House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte.  Jonathan Turley agreed.  “In ordering this blanket exception,” said Turley, “President Obama was nullifying part of a law that he simply disagreed with.  There is no claim of unconstitutionality.”  Said Rosenkrantz, “Exempting as many as 1.76 million people from the immigration laws goes far beyond any traditional conception of prosecutorial discretion.”

Encouraged by the media to keep drafting laws of his own choosing, Obama made nullification a central part of his governing philosophy.  “I’m eager to work with all of you,” he said to Congress of the 2014 State of the Union speech.  “But America does not stand still — and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

Said veteran civil libertarian Nat Hentoff, “Obama is a bad man in terms of the Constitution.”

Good constitutional arguments can be made for and against President Trump’s evocation of emergency powers to address the crisis at our southern border.  But the notion that such a declaration would encourage a future Democratic president to do something similar borders on the comic.  Democrats don’t need encouragement.

Under President Barack Obama, the Constitution was violated more wantonly than a goat at a Taliban bachelor party, and the faithful cheered every violation.  In early 2014, New Yorker editor and Obama groupie David Remnick wrote about his experience accompanying Obama on a west-coast fundraising tour.

At one stop, when Obama walked out on stage, “It happened again: another heckler broke into Obama’s speech.  A man in the balcony repeatedly shouted out, ‘Executive order!’ demanding that the President bypass Congress with more unilateral actions.”

Obama confirmed to the audience that, yes, people did want him to sign more executive orders and “basically nullify Congress.”  At that point, wrote Remnick, “Many in the crowd applauded their approval.  Yes!  Nullify it!”  These were not wild-eyed tent-dwellers on Wall or some lesser street.  These were potential donors.

By 2014, Obama had successfully nullified any number of laws with negligible media objection.  In February 2011, for instance, Obama and “wing man” Attorney General Eric Holder came willy-nilly to the conclusion that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was not “constitutional.”  President Bill Clinton signed DOMA into law in 1996 with overwhelming support from Democrats in Congress and nearly unanimous support from Republicans.

No matter.  Going forward, Obama decided that the Justice Department would no longer enforce DOMA.  That simple.  Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley had a hard time making legal sense out of Obama’s left-field decision to ignore DOMA.  For one, Turley found the timing curious.  The Obama administration had been defending the law for the previous two years, and the president, publicly, at least, had not changed his personal stance on redefining marriage.

For another, Obama was basing this policy change on an interpretation “that had thus far remained unsupported by direct precedent.”  By refusing to enforce DOMA, Obama was setting a precedent and not a good one — namely, that a president could refuse to defend a law based on a legal interpretation that no court had ever accepted.

On the subject of illegal immigration, Obama did not bother deeming existing laws unconstitutional.  He chose not to enforce them because they did not poll well among Hispanic voters. It would get no deeper than that.

Since year one of the Bush administration, Congress had been trying to pass the awkwardly titled Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, better known as the DREAM Act.  In a nutshell, this bill would have provided permanent residency to those illegal aliens who had arrived in the United States as minors and behaved themselves well enough not to get their mug shots plastered on the Post Office wall.

Although President Bush supported immigration reform, as did President Obama, neither the DREAM Act nor any major immigration bill made it to their desks. The reason was simple enough: no variation of such a bill could muster adequate congressional support.

In his 2006 book, Audacity of Hope, Obama praised the system of checks and balances in that it “encouraged the very process of information gathering, analysis, and argument.”  Once Obama ascended to the presidency, all those checks and balances just made it harder for him to transform America.

Obama’s constituencies, especially labor and the Hispanic lobby, wanted action, not gathering and arguing.  They started leaning on him to ignore Congress and act unilaterally.  One minor obstacle stood in the way, and that was Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution.  For the previous 220 years, that article had informed Congress in some detail on how to turn an idea into a law.

Obama could not enforce the DREAM Act, said constitutional scholar Nicholas Rosenkrantz, “by pretending that it passed when it did not.”  As late as March 2011, legal scholar Obama seemed to agree.  “America is a nation of laws, which means I, as the president, am obligated to enforce the law,” he told a Univision audience.  “With respect to the notion that I can just suspend deportations through executive order, that’s just not the case, because there are laws on the books that Congress has passed.”

By June 2012, what Obama said in March 2011 seemed as stale as a morning-after bowl of tortilla chips.  The president had lost his taste for all that legislative analysis and argument, given that the result was “an absence of any immigration action from Congress.”

Five months before the presidential election, he knew that the media would give him a pass, and he hoped Latinos would give him their vote.  So he decided to dispense with debate and fix immigration policy by his own lights, confident he could make that policy “more fair, more efficient, and more just.”

This fix started with presidentially guaranteed relief from deportation for the so-called “Dreamers.”  On top of that came the right to apply for work authorization, both guarantees in full defiance of existing federal law.  “There has long been a general consensus that a president cannot refuse to enforce a law that is considered constitutionally sound,” said Jonathan Turley.  That chapter was apparently missing from Obama’s law books.

On August 23, 2013, in a move that the major media barely noticed, the Obama administration subtly expanded the list of those who would be excluded from deportation.  Deep in a nine-page memo from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement headquarters to its field offices was an order that “prosecutorial discretion” be shown to parents or guardians of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents, AKA “Dreamers.”

The news scarcely troubled the media, let alone the citizenry, but at least a few Republicans noticed.  “President Obama has once again abused his authority and unilaterally refused to enforce our current immigration laws,” said House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte.  Jonathan Turley agreed.  “In ordering this blanket exception,” said Turley, “President Obama was nullifying part of a law that he simply disagreed with.  There is no claim of unconstitutionality.”  Said Rosenkrantz, “Exempting as many as 1.76 million people from the immigration laws goes far beyond any traditional conception of prosecutorial discretion.”

Encouraged by the media to keep drafting laws of his own choosing, Obama made nullification a central part of his governing philosophy.  “I’m eager to work with all of you,” he said to Congress of the 2014 State of the Union speech.  “But America does not stand still — and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”

Said veteran civil libertarian Nat Hentoff, “Obama is a bad man in terms of the Constitution.”

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/02/for_the_record_obama_made_mincemeat_of_the_constitution.html#ixzz5fu1wc42S
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Source:American Thinker